Item Coversheet


Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Request

October 25, 2018


AGENDA REQUEST NO: V.B.

AGENDA OF: Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting

INITIATED BY: Lauren Fehr, Principal Planner

PRESENTED BY: Lauren Fehr, Principal Planner

RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: Planning & Development Services

AGENDA CAPTION:

Consideration of and action on a recommendation for the proposed rezoning from Planned Development (PD) District General Development Plan to Planned Development (PD) District Final Development Plan for the Fluor corporate office campus project located along University Boulevard and Lexington Boulevard, of approximately 50.309  acres, to the Mayor and Members of City Council.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:
A recommendation of approval from the Commission to the Mayor and City Council.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This is the proposed Fluor 50 Acre Corporate Campus PD Final Development Plan (FDP). The proposed project is located along University Blvd., south of Lexington Blvd. and the Texas Instruments Campus and north of Wentworth Avenue. It is also located south of the City's Smart Financial Centre and the Telfair Tract 5 area.

 

The proposed FDP is within the Telfair Corporate District - Fluor Tract General Development Plan PD approved by City Council as Ordinance No. 1905 in May 2013. The General Development Plan included a number of shaping parameters for development of this property including guidelines to ensure a more integrated overall office campus. This proposed FDP includes an overall campus site plan as well as a potential subdivision plan which would guide any future subdivision of this property. This FDP is proposed as four separate reserves, Reserve A to be developed as the Fluor corporate office campus with provisions for limited retail, food, and services, and then Reserve B located in the rear of the property which will require a future PD amendment to be approved by City Council for specific development guidelines of that reserve. Reserve C is located along the southern boundary of the development and is intended as a landscape buffer area. Reserve D is for a new public street connecting Lexington Blvd. to University Blvd. through the 50-acre campus.

 

The Commission held a workshop on this item on July 26th on the proposed FDP. The workshop allowed the Commission to review a set of draft documents for the FDP, including exhibits, and pose questions to provide feedback to staff and the applicant. Several key areas of feedback included:

 

  • The need for additional detail as to the screening of the service areas adjacent to the retail area and day care and how they will be accessed via truck.
  • Detailed discussion on the proposed office building elevations, including the proposed facade material and a request for the applicant to provide a sample of the material during the next meeting.
  • A need to better understand what type of exterior facade elements are being proposed for the structured parking garages, and whether they will incorporate the use of an architectural metal screen wall.
  • A focus on the child day care center proposed within Reserve A, and a need to further understand its proposed operations onsite, ie. circulation and queuing.
  • A number of clerical edits and suggested modifications to the proposed FDP language and associated exhibits to provide clarity.

 

The Commission held a public hearing on September 11th with regard to the proposed FDP. There was one speaker from the public who had questions and comments regarding the project, but was not in opposition. The Commission was then able to provide key feedback and requested further revisions to the proposed FDP and exhibits. The following outlines the key revision requests:

 

  • Discussion regarding screening of the trash and service area adjacent to the retail village and an understanding of its visual impacts to the roadway and pedestrian promenade.
  • A request for additional detail of the loading dock area adjacent to the child day care and an understanding of its visual impacts to the public roadway.
  • Further review of the office building and parking garage elevations based on modifications made after the workshop meeting.
  • Additional clerical edits and suggested modifications to the proposed FDP language and associated exhibits to provide further clarity to the reader.

 

The applicant has since provided information to address the Commission's questions during the public hearing, and a more detailed description of the Commission discussion and applicant responses are included in the staff report below. Planning Staff believes the revisions made are in alignment with the Commission's feedback and supports a recommendation of approval to the Mayor and City Council for the proposed FDP.

 

 

CC: Richard.Conley@Fluor.com

       John.Dempsey@Fluor.com

       Zachary.Christeson@hok.com

       Mariam.Arian@hok.com


BUDGET

EXPENDITURE REQUIRED:  N/A

CURRENT BUDGET: N/A

ADDITIONAL FUNDING: N/A

ATTACHMENTS:
DescriptionType
Vicinity MapMaps
Miscellaneous Report InformationOther Supporting Documents
Proposed Fluor Campus Final Development PlanOther Supporting Documents